Pages

Sunday, May 15, 2011

Green Is the New Red, White & Blue



While this week’s AIA convention feels quieter than recent years, the annual event -- now in its 144th year -- got off to a strong start Thursday morning, with thousands of attendees filling the main ballroom at the New Orleans convention center for the opening keynote address.
The two-hour session, led by AIA President Clark Manus, included brief presentations by Robert Ivy, the institute’s new CEO (and former editor in chief of Architectural Record), and Steve McDowell of BNIM, the 2011 Firm of the Year. But the star of the show was Thomas Friedman, the New York Times foreign affairs columnist and Pulitzer Prize winner (he’s won three of them!). 
blog post photo
Photo courtesy Wikipedia

For his rousing presentation, Friedman pulled material from his recently updated book, Hot, Flat, and Crowded: Why We Need a Green Revolution, and How It Can Renew America, first published in fall 2008. 
The book’s central tents are that America 1) needs to stop being such an irresponsible pig; and 2) needs to lead the charge in developing sustainable energy sources that will mitigate global climate change. If it doesn’t do these two things, the U.S., once a powerhouse of innovation, will be left in the dust.
Friedman said he was inspired to write the book due to a “deep concern that our country had lost its groove.” He noted that Americans have been taking the same harmful approach to managing the economy and the environment: under-price risks, privatize gains, and socialize losses. In time, this approach will be catastrophic.
To continue our comfortable way of life well into the future, we need to revive the system of sustainable values that were in place decades ago. “If we don’t return to those values, we are going to be more ‘unfree’ than if the Soviets had won the Cold War,” Friedman said. He added: “When you’re dealing with the markets and Mother Nature, you’re dealing with the two most powerful, emotionless forces on the planet. ... One of these days, they will really show us what they’ve got.”
Given the exploding global population and impending energy shortage, another course of action for the U.S. should be the creation of “abundant, cheap, clean, and reliable electrons.” “This is going to be the next big global industry,” he said, noting that the U.S. should step up and take the reigns. “Green is the new red, white, and blue.” He added that the green movement currently afoot in the U.S. is no revolution. “Have you been to a revolution where nobody got hurt?” he said. “We’re having a green party.”
The profusion of lists on how to easily and cheaply “save the planet” indicate how uncommitted we are to the green revolution. True change will require sacrifices – and strong, tough-love leadership and policies. Friedman likes to tell people: “Change your leaders, not your light bulbs.

5 comments:

  1. ...i used to kinda like Friedman, but, less so now...he is all over the place and quite inconsistent...he wrote about the flat world...the reason the world became flat was based upon opening world trade AND abundant cheap fossil fuel...now, he finally seems to be getting the peak oil thesis, but, does not connect the dots that bodes the end of the world is flat and that local production will be the new black...this will be good for jobs, btw... "U.S. should be the creation of “abundant, cheap, clean, and reliable elec"...well, that is a good (and expensive) idea, and the only practical and GREEN way is nuclear, probably in the form of thorium (as opposed to uranium)...he does not even seem to understand that it is the cheap liquid fuels that makes the world flat and that is coming to an end...the world is no longer going to be flat it is going to small and local...the problem the blue team has is they want something to happen, but have no idea of the scope of the problem they are trying to solve...just as ignorant as the red team that says there is no peak oil, technology will save us...do you believe in magic...

    ReplyDelete
  2. I dont believe in a magic, idealized or purely political solution. Developing Alternative or Innovation in energy sources seems that it has to be structured to be profitable for business and a recognized national survival instinct inspired by and incentivized by inspired leadership. ( tough in a dysfunctional red/blue system) A Lunar Landing challenge is needed to focus our resources. Think of the resources (Blood and Treasure we spend fighting wars to protect our access to middle eastern oil. Energy needs require multiple sources. Does France supply 80% of its energy from Nuclear?
    It always come down to a choice, the system is broken, thats just the way it is OR the system is functional but unsustainable and how can we do better, how can we capitalize on the opportunities, what is the Win Win senario?

    ReplyDelete
  3. The world has so hundreds of years supply of natural gas. We are also flaring a lot of it in oil fields with no gas market close by.

    What we have to do is convert to fuel cells that use natural gas to convert into electricity. Every house and business should have a fuel cell supplying its electricity. We can then cut down all the power lines that lose 20% of their power to heat/friction.

    We need to quit dithering with wind and solar, they just make us feel better and don't solve a darn thing. We also have to quit using corn as an alternative!

    In the meantime I will drive my 7.0 liter Z06 as hard as I want, the greenies be damned!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dithering? JL I propose we are thinking too small. I have great faith in the potential of technological innovation and creativity given incentive and support. Nature is renewable and self sustaining.

    "The total solar energy absorbed by Earth's atmosphere, oceans and land masses is approximately 3,850,000 exajoules (EJ) per year.[6] In 2002, this was more energy in one hour than the world used in one year.[11][12] Photosynthesis captures approximately 3,000 EJ per year in biomass.[8] The amount of solar energy reaching the surface of the planet is so vast that in one year it is about twice as much as will ever be obtained from all of the Earth's non-renewable resources of coal, oil, natural gas, and mined uranium combined.[13]

    ReplyDelete
  5. ...i am impressed with how really big you are thinking FE, seriously, you have certainly expanded my horizon...but, what is the timeline and what are we going to do in the interim?....those who predict are wise to either predict the outcome or the timeline, but not both...

    ReplyDelete